Showing posts with label hysteria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hysteria. Show all posts

Thursday, July 26, 2012

The wild within is male

We advocate openness in social interactions between people because man is not an island. Sociability, we say, is a driving need, along with food, drink, sex and security. We believe globalization shrinks the world into a village, and expect universal brotherhood to spread across borders. Yet when diverse people occupy the same space, rage responses tend to heighten. On the streets or in public gatherings, the offenders are largely male.


This dichotomy of thought and action among human populations may relate to resource availability. It may also be a consequence of social reorganizations, and in the pursuit of power, because whosoever corners the wealth, corners social advantage. If any organization is to succeed as such, it needs rules and penalties for rule-breakers, acknowledged and accepted by all the group members. The implementations of these rules require measures to install a leadership ready to make the hard choices, and to compel followers to acquiesce to the decisions made on their behalf. Else, the larger numbers perpetrate more chaos, increasing group vulnerability. To obtain power in the group and to maintain that power, force becomes the weapon of choice. The organization sanctions controlled aggression to police the detractors of its ideology, and to keep divisive influences at bay.

That sociability is instrumental in group security and the propagation of species is clear in the wild. Aggression on other groups is also a law of the jungle. On the anvil of the food chain, the weak are the first casualties. Humans, naturally so in comparison to other predators, thus have the least likelihood of survival especially against the group aggression of packs and herds. The physical disadvantage is overcome with the powers of the mind, the creation of tools and weapons. The early understanding of the strength in numbers, leads to the organized community living we like to call civilization. Hierarchy and the divisions of labour are created to harmonize social relations that continue in time, often held sacrosanct as traditions.

Needless to say, male domination is the operative tradition in most human cultures. Despite the apparently superior thought processes amongst their populations, the presence of others evokes feelings of competitiveness, frustration, expectations, and so on. Civilized populations have been especially preoccupied with male lineage through millennia. Extrapolating the might is right doctrine of the animal world, many presume to infringe on the rights of other individuals and groups. The history of cultures around the world records innumerable intrigues, assassination plots, battles and wars, wherein the lives of thousands have been sacrificed over genealogical claims.

We commonly assume that all other animals cannot think ahead as the humans do. Their responses are purely instinctive, we say - to attack when hungry or in defence of young. However, because the environment is constantly changing, each species must learn to adapt to change or face extinction. They too must evolve, and perhaps do so to adopt processes to moderate the social organization not unlike the human strategy. Experiments controlling space with other animals confirm that crowding increases irritability, and thence the rage.

Within several higher orders of the animal world, internecine male aggression powers survival not just against environmental adversity, but also of the particular lineage - yes, male. A pride of lions for instance, generally consists of one alpha male and several lionesses as one large family. Male cubs coming of age are ejected by their mothers to find their own destiny. Leadership depends on physical prowess, and the patriarch must continually prove his ability in combat with challengers. Should he be defeated, the victor takes control to form a new family. The lionesses must hide their existing male cubs to keep them alive, because to establish his authority, and while seeding his own family tree, the new leader sets about decimating future threats.


Male hormones like testosterone are implicated in this physiology of aggression. Fact is the male is genetically programmed to fight. The male group of hormones, the androgens, secrete from sex and adrenal glands. They are responsible for the visual splendour of the train of peacock tail feathers or the full-grown lion mane. These displays feed the universal myth of male domination, although they are merely the secondary sexual characteristics of the species. The preening and posturing of the male is needed to outshine other males to attract the females, or else the lineage ends. The failure to scare off the opposition creates stress, prompts fear and rage. Consequently, other hormones from the adrenal glands flood the system, causing the adrenaline rush of instant action.

The explosive testosterone-adrenaline combo fuels violence. Sometimes, the destructive results appear purposeless. The frenzy of rogue elephants, for example, demolishes, maims or kills everything in their path. This masti phenomenon appears to affect young adult males the most. Studies in the African wilds reveal that, male calves orphaned perchance or by human interventions, tend to become anti-social in later years. Separated from their herd early in life, they are forced to fend for themselves in the wild. Essentially, the orphans have been deprived during the formative stages of growing up, of crucial social learning within the herd, and hence their insecurity and lacks of socializing spill over. The senseless violence reflected amongst the human youth around the world may perhaps stem from similar underlying deprivations.

The organization itself is like a living organism; it needs a brain to reason, decision-make and direct. The group’s leadership is this brain that strategizes its activities and deliberates on ways to sustain its longevity. To preserve the harmony between individuals and groups, the community leadership has the heavy duty to delineate the boundaries, and socialize the total organization into them; to reclaim, not destroy, even the socially disruptive. 


An effective process of taming rogue elephants has been the company of trained bigger, older bulls. These more experienced elephants withstand their aggressive onslaughts, and also help bring down their seemingly uncontrollable rages. Perhaps human organizations need to offer their rudderless youth similar opportunities to control the instinctive, unthinking behaviours born of abondonment, fear and rage. Appropriate mentoring in sociability may actually bring the aggressive male out of the lonely wild within, and integrate him into mainstream society.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Denial: the shift of focus



Denial, as they say, is not just a river in Egypt.



The dictionary defines the word as the act of gainsaying, refusing, or disowning; negation; the contrary of affirmation. In psychology, it is termed a defence mechanism. Essentially, denial signals the desire to maintain a certain status quo.

Denial is amongst the favoured modes of operation of many people at home and in society. In each case a certain image of self or the organization is being protected. At home, it becomes useful when the standing with other members of the family is perceived in jeopardy. In bureaucratic circles, image preservation before the world at large becomes important.

The trouble with denial is that it does little to change reality. It simply allows the doer to extend his or her stay in the world of fantasy wherein all proceedings play out according to one’s personal fable, or an official line being held sacrosanct. People seek to live out their lies, while issues of actuality develop unchecked.


Used in tandem with denial (of reality) is projection, another defence mechanism that claims that one’s faults are actually the faults of another. Literally it is the act of throwing or shooting forward in attributions. In the process, introspection at home is eliminated.

Of great concern to India and to the expat community are reports that the attacks on Indians in Australia are racially motivated. Australian governmental officials play down implications that that country may not be safe for Indians by insisting that the events in question are merely criminal acts. In response to the Indian advisory to students seeking education abroad that they need to exercise caution in moving about freely, they accuse their counterparts of fueling “hysteria”. Crime, they say, exists in Australian metropolitan cities in the same way that it does in Mumbai, Delhi or Kolkata.

The reality is that the acts are criminal – robbery, assault and battery, and so on. The reality also is that Indians are targets, specifically because they are considered potentially soft when compared to others. In that sense, the cases reported on are criminal as well as racially motivated. In the ensuing diplomatic acrimony, an important fact evades attention – that most of the attackers are minors.

The Hindu reports:



According to the dossier submitted to the government, nearly half of those arrested so far or on the run are juvenile or under 18 years of age.



It is possible that the global economic downturn has created frustration anger in the new generation perceiving a bleak future in adult working life. The bureaucratic response of denial of the issue will not make these events disappear. This growing phenomenon of minors taking to crime as a solution to their problems should be of a greater concern to the people and governments of any nation.


Children are the future of a nation, and in these cases, a noticeable complement of them is being neglected or misguided. It is clear that their nurturance is in need of focus. The protection of an apparent image through denial is hardly the best way to combat the rise of racial profiling for criminal intent. Full-blown racism is only a flea skip away.


Links:

Denial

Projection

Most attackers of Indians in Australia are youth